Democratic Party Proposal about Health: Since it is not right - newspaper health care

In order to restart national health services, I read an interview with the Democratic Health Manager, Marina Cereni, which presented a draft of the Democratic Party and the "newspaper" for the right to mobilize public health.

At first he hit me so far he was in silence so far.No one commented or protested.Those who are not from a democratic party are not.I believe that in addition to many health shells, most of the others fled from destructive political influences.

It is, especially for the field and stomach stomach, as well as health problems in our country, while Schlein can be the most private.

- The possibility of improving public health today is affected by huge contradictions: the huge impact of the tax incentives the state uses to encourage private markets.Repeat, in our economic situation, the budget is unthinkable to spend money on public health and private health.

Unable to do not continue to require a path to do not continue to resolve money.

Christian Democratic Line

The proposal of the Democratic Health Party should define -Because we will say in Rome, a shameless line, that is, a line full of holes and contradictions, that is, the distance, waste and gap and therefore, for people's problems, it is certainly not enough, inappropriate, but also inappropriate.

The proud line, but also includes this, especially "Christian Democrat", which means that what is written in the proposal of the Democratic Party is not really wrong, but also "real and wrong", so it is in favor of private and public and for justice.

The local participation and interclasist, to update an old definition, health and satisfaction, and weakness and weakness.

But you can be perfect as you want, but at the end of the fact, what, you have to do it.Democratic party introduced today is not fair, incorrect, giant, wants to call the PD to the left.

Competitive power does not end

Health rights As I commented on my books several times, they have died in recent years "Health" and "Health".

On the first side it was sufficient to transform the fundamental right into correct strength, in the second it was enough to implement a devilish mechanism I have for years suggested to define the "competitive exclusion".

In the woods, destruction-competitive "when in the species, from the general and private competition to sing to the wax.

Nothing can do anything can do nothing, it's the one that we're away.

- Millions of people who leave reasons for income reasons;

- Millions of people, that is, families are forced to enter, so pay for care directly.

In the proposal of the Democratic Party, no one has written how it is believed that this contradiction is moving away.So she wonders: in unchanging contradictions, but how Schlein, the poor girl, to move the Democratic Party to the left?Is this going to be a "different beach"?

Undeniable antinomia

The Democratic Party line comes out of distance and has a long story about discussions and failures, but a democratic party that I do not repeat with this story.

-What argument between people supports the dialog box in the ability to place the fake and others and other people);

In the 1990s, with the Prodi of Blair and Italy, the "third method" in the 1990s was the same strategy as a proposal to actually propose a Democratic party for health today, and it was found to be deadly and bankrupt as proved by events just mentioned.

In recent years, the experience of health in the financial regimes has been clearly demonstrated, identifying rights and interest, but especially for the correct order.

Trump, at work and military spending

But let's maintain the tragic experience of this year, so to date, so when you understand the interior material of PD, so the military team is measuring the traditional and healthy.

The question hides anxiety. If the democratic proposals are the ones we read today, such as constant funds can be changed in the letter of democratic health.

The new dangers

For example, today it is possible that due to the severity of the financial situation in our country, the attack on the rights on NHS, thus emphasizes the competitive depression system described, which increases the process of privatization of health.

This means that it is possible that neoliberalism in healthcare can be easily transferred to neo -mulyhusianism, that is, to real social darvinism.If everything depends mainly on income and less and less rights, it is possible that for millions of people whose income takes over the rights, social abandonment is growing, which increases the number of people who are no longer care.

Even to imagine the pocker to support the pocket (Bubbles), the number of bubbles will always be high as a result of the person who will be omitted from the treatment.That's going to be forced to receive a hyuger before NHS.

Of course, we don't expect, but the political questions are kept.

Since we will not be remembered that we are in Trump's danger and that our economy will be even more difficult, repeating the question: today, what are you going to do?

If the money asked, PD is not

The PD is seeking to refuse to combat the current tax system, if health historical costs are not radically radically rejected, I will consider it absolutely radically.

If I'm not mistaken, I'm only alone who promoted the fourth change.

They think that many people on the left, say very interesting, do, to remove money from meetings to complete a military.

Largo Alpo and Stations

To my opinion, towards this issues in the Democratic Party's health is in fact actually missing the same, all the next political elections and, as soon as possible

To win the election, Schlein One is right, it takes a broad field, but knowing that it is not enough to join the "whole", cantor will say, many sintin or very bad.

So it requires a new strategy that gives us the opportunity to transfer the left to the government, but exceeds its historical failure.

Answers and Populism

Asce with my central point, a relationships, what statements, looks at a gendeni, the princess is.

With an exception to be described only with the only political question that I planned before: administrator but the Trump period?

In the Democratic Party Document provides two presentans exactly found on health:

-What is the first, I have the first child I have said, he is life, a question and new

- Second, the following years, then Libya Turko is healthy in all politics in these years.

A Revained Party Relations Prohibited Economic and Health Prohibition

Reading this last repetition, today during Trump, I lived in a factory factory, which did not talk and "nothing", I could smile.

Where the employees forget or ignore if today, together with a trade, relationship-risks do not match.With the responsibility of the role I found that merge of business and health is difficult.Health planning, which is available in arts.3 of ACT 833.

If art.3, in my opinion, is very difficult -especially at the time of tasks -that the economy has to do with health. If there is no link between economy and health at task, how to apply what remains very little -Article 32?

We're during "who says"

In the end, I remember that today trump does not just put the duly duly, but the trump turned out of it that damaged any relationship with the world.

Ultimately, economic issues created by duties are likely to reduce measures that underpin the meaning of the economy, and I think death is very difficult to reduce the meaning of the economy.

Maintaining health in all age policies in one's life's life - as shown, life, life is a good way to draw, and not just a democratic party.

As a result of the PD proposal, it is guaranteed "heavy" and it is said that this is necessary for PD.In fact, as I have shown up to date because there is no change.It's not a change.

To have a rotation point, the output strategy must be defined.Justification is easy: to be a broad field, you need an output strategy;To do the output strategy, you need a wide pole.

A wide field was built in the nineties to make olive trees. The Democrats thought there was just a crazy Boiata in the Trump era, and I was standing on it - I was on it - it might be dear Schlein, a crazy Boiata, and in Trump's era, the Democrats thought of the same plan.

The exit strategy is used, at least in protecting health, with all the obstacles that will make it virtually impossible to create a wide field between progressive forces today.

As for me, I wrote this exit strategy. So, as readers know, I thought they would come sooner or later. So I call everyone, but mainly the Democrats and therefore Ellie Schlein and Marina Sereni, do not think there is someone else to read this suggestion if I do not do so.

This is well explained in two sources that I of course refer to:

- My last book "My 32 Article 32 And is in the middle of Castelvecchi, 2025);

- An article in the press and published in the next issue of "causes" socialism, specifically dedicated to "Largo" and "Exit Strategy".

The last question I request that PDA is inevitable: In the interest of the country, PDA is ready to send his "PAPACTular" output strategy to write a departure strategy and return to government?

I have proposed since now, in the autumn recovery, to open the speech of outgoing strategy, of course makes me available to a large field if you have to do so.